Diaz-Cayeros, Magaloni, and Weingast: Tragic brilliance
Disclaimer. Don't rely on these old notes in lieu of reading the literature, but they can jog your memory. As a grad student long ago, my peers and I collaborated to write and exchange summaries of political science research. I posted them to a wiki-style website. "Wikisum" is now dead but archived here. I cannot vouch for these notes' accuracy, nor can I even say who wrote them. If you have more recent summaries to add to this collection, send them my way I guess. Sorry for the ads; they cover the costs of keeping this online.
Diaz-Cayeros, Magaloni, and Weingast. 2003. Tragic brilliance: Equilibrium hegemony and democratization in Mexico. Manuscript.
How do unpopular one-party regimes continue to attract votes (as the PRI did)?
The Lit's (incorrect) Answers
- Coercion: If this were the answer, authoritarian states wouldn't be more likely to fall during rough economic times--yet they are.
- Legitimacy through economic success: The PRI endured several rough economic times. So this can't be the whole answer.
Argument: A 'tragic' and 'brilliant' solution
- Tragic: They force citizens to accept corruption, inefficient policies, and poor government service.
- Brilliant: They create incentives so that citizens willingly vote for them anyway. Rather than vote retrospectively (against PRI), voters vote prospectively (to avoid losing clientelistic benefits that the PRI can provide).
Central Funding of Municipalities
To gain a foothold, an opposition party would need to win some local races. But municipal governments depend on the central government for their money. And the PRI credibly threatens to dramatically reduce funding to (i.e. punish) any municipality that elects an opposition party. Thus, in order for the local government to be able to continue to function, citizens have strong incentives to vote for PRI, not an opposition party.
Two Additional Factors Hurting the Opposition
- No record in the national government, therefore no credibility on policy promises.
- No access to central government's funds, therefore can't commit to provide roads, water, sewage, power, etc., without PRI's support.
Three Trends that Weaken the PRI (from comparative statics)
- Economic collapse in the 1980s and the 1994 Peso crisis reduced the resources available to the PRI to reward supporters.
- Economic modernization differentiated localities, making some more likely to defect from the PRI.
- Biggie: The Mexican economy's growing internationalization allowed people to get wealth on their own: More jobs, more integration with the US, and more remittances from family working in the US gave voters a credible exit strategy from the PRI.
- Holding other factors constant, opposition municipalities do receive less money from the capitol.
- The municipalities most likely to defect are those facing the greatest opportunity costs to staying under the inefficient PRI (i.e. the three variables listed above).
Research by the same authors
- De Figueiredo and Weingast: The rationality of fear
- Greif, Milgrom, and Weingast: Coordination, commitment, and enforcement
- McCubbins, Noll, and Weingast: Administrative procedures as instruments of political control
- McCubbins, Noll, and Weingast: Structure and process, politics and policy
- Milgrom, North, and Weingast: The role of institutions in the revival of trade
- Weingast and Marshall: The industrial organization of Congress
- Weingast and Moran: Bureaucratic discretion or Congressional control
- Weingast: The economic role of political institutions
Research on similar subjects
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto (author) • Magaloni, Beatriz (author) • Weingast, Barry (author) • Comparative Politics • Single Party Dominance
Wikisum home: Index of all summaries by title, by author, or by subject.