Menu Adam R Brown

Notes navigation: Browse by titleBrowse by authorSubject index

Hillygus and Jackman: Voter decision making in election 2000

Disclaimer. Don't rely on these old notes in lieu of reading the literature, but they can jog your memory. As a grad student long ago, my peers and I collaborated to write and exchange summaries of political science research. I posted them to a wiki-style website. "Wikisum" is now dead but archived here. I cannot vouch for these notes' accuracy, nor can I even say who wrote them. If you have more recent summaries to add to this collection, send them my way I guess. Sorry for the ads; they cover the costs of keeping this online.

Hillygus and Jackman. 2003. Voter decision making in election 2000: Campaign effects, partisan activation, and the Clinton lega. AJPS 47: 583-96.

Main Point

By looking at panel data using daily surveys during the 2000 campaign, we can see what kinds of voters are likely to switch vote choice, and when. Aggregate data (e.g. Johnston et al 2001) does not allow us to say 'who' is changing their mind, only that aggregate support for each candidate has changed.

Findings

Data

Survey data conducted from a randomly selected panel frequently during the campaign season. Many responses every day. Panel effects are minimized because the panel answered only a few political questions mixed in with frequent marketing surveys.

Criticism

Research on similar subjects

Tags

Hillygus, D Sunshine (author)Jackman, Simon (author)Political ScienceAmerican PoliticsVotingPartisanshipPublic OpinionMedia EffectsDecision Making

Wikisum home: Index of all summaries by title, by author, or by subject.