Ideology scores for the Utah Senate, 2012

Political scientists have developed advanced algorithms that can calculate each legislator's ideology score based on his or her legislative voting record. Here I use the W-NOMINATE method (it's an acronym, hence the caps). Important caveats:

1. Ideology scores have no scale. There is not a number that means "liberal" or "conservative." Scores have only relative meaning, so that a lower score indicates a more liberal voting record than a higher score.
2. Scores are only comparable within a single chamber, within a single year. You cannot compare House scores to Senate scores, and you cannot compare 2018 scores to 2019 scores. (That's because of caveat #1: Scores have no scale.)
3. Scores reflect what comes to the floor. In a supermajority Republican Legislature, most fights are between moderate Republicans and conservative Republicans, not between Republicans and Democrats. Thus, scores calculated from votes in the Utah Legislature will reveal more daylight among Republicans than among Democrats.
4. Zero does not mean "moderate," it just means "the middle of this group of legislators." See the preceding point. Also, "moderate" Utah Republican legislators are usually pretty conservative on a national scale.
5. Scores close to 100 are not "most loyal Republicans." Even calling these "most conservative" would be very misleading, since it implies these legislators come closest to some conservative standard. Utah is a very conservative state, and a legislator near the middle of this particular Republican pack is likewise very conservative. Scores near 100 indicate Republicans at the extreme end of the scale, who are to the right of even most Republicans, and perhaps well to the right of the Republican party platform.

You can find a thorough discussion of these ideology scores at the Utah data points blog.

The scores below are for 2012 in the Utah Senate. Select a different year here:
House: - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021
Senate: - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021

Distribution of scores

The plot below summarizes how many legislators fall into each score range. There is one "D" for each Democrat in the given range, and one "R" for each Republican. There are 29 legislators in the Utah Senate.

 -100 to -90 | DDD
-90.1 to -80 | 
-80.1 to -70 | 
-70.1 to -60 | 
-60.1 to -50 | DDDD
-50.1 to -40 | 
-40.1 to -30 | 
-30.1 to -20 | 
-20.1 to -10 | 
  -10.1 to 0 | 
   0.1 to 10 | 
  10.1 to 20 | 
  20.1 to 30 | RR
  30.1 to 40 | 
  40.1 to 50 | R
  50.1 to 60 | RRRRR
  60.1 to 70 | RRRRR
  70.1 to 80 | RRRRRR
  80.1 to 90 | R
 90.1 to 100 | RR

Detailed ideology data

If you use this data in published work, please credit me appropriately.

Legislator	Party	Chamber	Year	Ideology score
Romero, Ross I.	D	Senate	2012	-99.9
McAdams, Benjamin M.	D	Senate	2012	-98.1
Escamilla, Luz Robles	D	Senate	2012	-94.0
Davis, Gene	D	Senate	2012	-59.5
Morgan, Karen W.	D	Senate	2012	-57.3
Jones, Patricia W.	D	Senate	2012	-54.4
Mayne, Karen	D	Senate	2012	-53.2
Hillyard, Lyle W.	R	Senate	2012	24.0
Van Tassell, Kevin T.	R	Senate	2012	27.2
Knudson, Peter C.	R	Senate	2012	46.3
Weiler, Todd	R	Senate	2012	51.3
Osmond, Aaron	R	Senate	2012	52.9
Okerlund, Ralph	R	Senate	2012	53.7
Stevenson, Jerry W.	R	Senate	2012	55.0
Christensen, Allen M.	R	Senate	2012	58.2
Niederhauser, Wayne L.	R	Senate	2012	62.3
Reid, Stuart C.	R	Senate	2012	63.5
Adams, J. Stuart	R	Senate	2012	64.9
Urquhart, Stephen H.	R	Senate	2012	65.2
Bramble, Curtis S.	R	Senate	2012	70.0
Waddoups, Michael G.	R	Senate	2012	76.8
Hinkins, David P.	R	Senate	2012	77.7
Thatcher, Daniel W.	R	Senate	2012	77.9
Jenkins, Scott K.	R	Senate	2012	79.3
Stephenson, Howard A.	R	Senate	2012	79.9
Valentine, John L.	R	Senate	2012	79.9
Madsen, Mark B.	R	Senate	2012	86.6
Dayton, Margaret	R	Senate	2012	93.8
Anderson, Casey O.	R	Senate	2012	99.5