Thompson and Moncrief: Campaign finance in state legislative elections
Disclaimer. Don't rely on these old notes in lieu of reading the literature, but they can jog your memory. As a grad student long ago, my peers and I collaborated to write and exchange summaries of political science research. I posted them to a wiki-style website. "Wikisum" is now dead but archived here. I cannot vouch for these notes' accuracy, nor can I say who wrote them.
Thompson and Moncrief, eds. 1998. Campaign finance in state legislative elections. Washington DC: CQ Press.
Lays out the general approach of the book. Looks at how campaign spending/finance varies with (1) legislative professionalism, (2) size of the state, (3) campaign finance laws, etc. See Table 1-2 (pg 15).
Chapter 5: Candidate Revenues in State Legislative Primaries
Many of the conclusions are what you would expect: e.g. Candidates spend more money in contested primaries than uncontested. A significant conclusion is that the incumbency advantage kicks in early in the campaign, with incumbents raising significant sums during primaries--and spending it in the general election (against a challenger who probably had to spend more just to win his primary). Thus, campaign finance reforms that put limits on contributions might have an effect opposite to what is intended: They might put a further handicap on challengers (relative to incumbents).
Chapter 6: Expenditures and the Election Results
The controversy (chicken-egg): Does money cause election results, or does money simply go toward likely winners?
- Challengers' ability to compete is related to their ability to keep up with incumbents' spending--but few challengers are able to do so. For challengers, then, money does buy elections.
- Candidate-centered campaigns cost more than partisan campaigns. In closely (partisan) competitive states, challengers can win with less money (based on party ID).
- Public financing reduces the incumbency advantage
Research by the same authors
Research on similar subjects
- Ansolabehere, de Figueiredo, and Snyder: Why is there so little money in US politics (3 shared tags)
- Hogan: The costs of representation in state legislatures (3 shared tags)
- Thompson, Cassie, and Jewell: A sacred cow or just a lot of bull (3 shared tags)
- Cox and Katz: Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections grow (2 shared tags)
- Holbrook, Krosnick, Visser, and Gardner: Attitudes toward presidential candidates (2 shared tags)
- Lau, Sigelman, Heldman, and Babbitt: The effects of negative political advertisements (2 shared tags)
- Sigelman and Kugler: Why is research on the effects of negative campaigning so inconclusive (2 shared tags)
- Turett: The vulnerability of American governors, 1900-1969 (2 shared tags)
Thompson, Joel (author) • Moncrief, Gary (author) • American Politics • Elections • Campaign Finance
Wikisum home: Index of all summaries by title, by author, or by subject.