Menu Adam R Brown

Notes navigation: Browse by titleBrowse by authorSubject index

Linz and Stepan: Problems of democratic transition and consolidation

Disclaimer. Don't rely on these old notes in lieu of reading the literature, but they can jog your memory. As a grad student long ago, my peers and I collaborated to write and exchange summaries of political science research. I posted them to a wiki-style website. "Wikisum" is now dead but archived here. I cannot vouch for these notes' accuracy, nor can I say who wrote them.

Linz and Stepan. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ch. 1

CONSOLIDATION: Put simply, democracy is consolidated when it becomes the "only game in town" (see pg 5 for what this means). They take this to mean three things. Behaviorally, no group is seriously engaged in secession or regime change. Attitudinally, most people accept that democracy is the best form of government (so not only does nobody try to change the regime, nobody particularly wants to). Constitutionally, democracy is consolidated when all the major organs of the state act according to the democratic institutions.

This means more than elections. There need to be five institutions (assuming, first of all, that there is a state): freedoms necessary for development of civil society (not just group memberships), an "autonomous and valued political society" (parties, elections, legislatures, etc.), rule of law (i.e. laws apply to leaders too), usable bureacracy (i.e. state capacity), and "institutionalized economic society" to mediate between the state and the market (pg 11). (pg 7 for list of all 5). See the chart on page 14 for a nice summary of all these "arenas."

Research by the same authors

Research on similar subjects


Linz, Juan (author)Stepan, Alfred (author)Comparative PoliticsDemocracyConsolidationRegime TypeAuthoritarianismTotalitarianismDemocratization

Wikisum home: Index of all summaries by title, by author, or by subject.