Menu Adam R Brown

Return to the Guide to the Utah Legislature.

Representative Bradley A. Winn
Utah legislator profile

Years served in the Utah legislature

First session in legislature: 2001
Most recent year of service for which data are available: 2009
Total sessions served in Utah House as of 2009: 6
Total sessions served in Utah Senate as of 2009: 0

How to read the statistical profile

I present a variety of statistics about Rep. Bradley A. Winn's service in the Utah legislature. I highlight differences from chamber averages using little green and red arrows. The number of arrows is statistically determined. More arrows indicate a larger difference compared to the chamber average, in relation to how much diversity there is among legislators on this metric. If all legislators introduce exactly 5 bills, then a legislator who introduces 10 is very different; if legislators vary wildly in how many bills they introduce (but the average is still 5), then a legislator who introduces 10 bills may be less different from average. The standard deviation measures this diversity.

Rep. Winn's statistical profile

20082009
Service summary. Service prior to 2007 (if any) is not shown here. My database goes back only to 2007.
  Chamber HouseHouse
  District H68H68
  Party RR
Leadership NoneNone
Years in chamber 56
Years comparison ====
 
20082009
Bills sponsored (learn more) Bills written and promoted by the legislator in his/her own chamber.
Introduced by Winn 44
Chamber average 6.15.9
Difference -2.1-1.9
Comparison LowerLower
 
20082009
Bill passage rate (learn more). What percent of Rep. Winn's sponsored bills pass and are officially "enrolled"? (I ignore whether the governor signed or vetoted the bill.)
Bills introduced 44
Bills passed 14
Passage rate 25.0%100.0%
Chamber average 52.8%59.9%
Difference -27.8+40.1
Comparison LowerLowerHigherHigher
 
20082009
Bills floor sponsored. A "floor sponsor" is like a secondary sponsor of a bill. After a bill passes the sponsor's chamber, its sponsor needs to find a "floor sponsor" in the other chamber to usher it through the other chamber.
Total floor sponsored 31
Chamber average 3.22.8
Difference -0.2-1.8
Comparison ==Lower
 
20082009
Missed votes (learn more). Usually missed votes occur because of competing obligations within the legislature, not because the legislator has left the capitol.
Missed votes 10039
Total votes held 616600
Absentee rate 16.2%6.5%
Chamber average 8.3%6.0%
Difference +7.9+0.5
Comparison HigherHigher==
 
20082009
"Nay" votes (learn more). Most floor votes pass by overwhelming majorities, since unpopular bills get weeded out long before they reach the floor. As a result, "nay" votes are rare.
"Nay" votes 1536
Total votes held 616600
"Nay" rate 2.4%6.0%
Chamber average 6.0%8.1%
Difference -3.6-2.1
Comparison LowerLowerLower
 
20082009
Influence or "floor power" (learn more). What percentage of the time is the legislator on the winning side of a floor vote?
Floor power score 85.4%69.8%
Chamber average 68.9%66.5%
Difference +16.5+3.3
Comparison HigherHigher==
 
20082009
Ideology score 1 (from interest group ratings). Half a dozen interest groups release ratings of each legislator after each legislative session. I rescale them all from 0 (most liberal) to 100 (most conservative) and average them together, resulting in the numbers reported here.
Average rating 47.865.0
Chamber average 46.655.2
Difference +1.2+9.8
Comparison ==Higher
 
20082009
Ideology score 2 (NOMINATE method) (learn more). Using a widely accepted scaling method, I calculate each legislator's ideology score (called a "NOMINATE" score) after each legislative session. I describe the method here. Scores have no intrinsic meaning; they are useful only for comparing two legislators. A legislator with a higher score is more to the right ideologically of a legislator with a lower scale. In most years, a conservative Republican will have a score above 0; a score close to 100 is extreme.
NOMINATE score 14.837.9
Chamber average -2.53.9
Difference +17.3+34.0
Comparison ==Higher
 
20082009
Party support score (overall) (learn more). How consistently does Rep. Winn support his/her party? That is, what percentage of the time does the legislator vote with the majority of the other members of his/her party? Scores are usually easily above 90%.
Score (overall) 97.9%95.7%
Chamber average 95.4%94.3%
Difference +2.5+1.4
Comparison HigherHigherHigher
 
20082009
Party support score (party-line only) (learn more). This is the same as the "raw" party support score, but we look only at party-line votes when calculating this. A "party-line" vote occurs when the majority of Democrats votes against the majority of Republicans. Although party-line votes are rare, looking at the legislator's party support score in this setting can be revealing.
Score (party-line only) 85.4%87.1%
Chamber average 81.7%81.4%
Difference +3.7+5.7
Comparison ==Higher

Votes on Rep. Winn's bills

Only 6 bills sponsored by Rep. Winn have come to a vote. Listed below are all votes held on bills that Rep. Winn sponsored. The votes are sorted by vote margin, with the most divisive votes listed first.

Year Sponsor Bill Ayes Nays Margin
(as % of total votes)
Type of vote
2009 Winn HJR007 19 8 40.7% Senate/ pass 3rd
2009 Winn HJR007 21 7 50.0% Senate/ pass 2nd
2009 Winn HR0001 54 16 54.3% House/ passed 3rd reading
2009 Winn HJR007 51 14 56.9% House/ passed 3rd reading
2008 Winn HCR008 57 14 60.6% House/ passed 3rd reading
2009 Winn HB0323 71 1 97.2% House/ passed 3rd reading
2009 Winn HB0323 26 0 100.0% Senate/ pass 3rd
2009 Winn HB0120S02 20 0 100.0% Senate/ pass 3rd
2009 Winn HB0120S02 25 0 100.0% Senate/ pass 2nd (Suspension
2009 Winn HB0120S02 71 0 100.0% House/ passed 3rd reading