Return to the Guide to the Utah Legislature.
First session in legislature: | 1999 |
Most recent year of service for which data are available: | 2020 |
Total sessions served in Utah House as of 2020: | 12 |
Total sessions served in Utah Senate as of 2020: | 0 |
I present a variety of statistics about Rep. LaWanna Lou Shurtliff's service in the Utah legislature. I highlight differences from chamber averages using little green and red arrows. The number of arrows is statistically determined. More arrows indicate a larger difference compared to the chamber average, in relation to how much diversity there is among legislators on this metric. If all legislators introduce exactly 5 bills, then a legislator who introduces 10 is very different; if legislators vary wildly in how many bills they introduce (but the average is still 5), then a legislator who introduces 10 bills may be less different from average. The standard deviation measures this diversity.
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Service summary. Service prior to 2007 (if any) is not shown here. My database goes back only to 2007. | |||||
Chamber | House | House | House | House | |
District | H10 | H10 | H10 | H10 | |
Party | D | D | D | D | |
Leadership | None | None | None | None | |
Years in chamber | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
Years comparison | |||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Bills sponsored (learn more) Bills written and promoted by the legislator in his/her own chamber. | |||||
Introduced by Shurtliff | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
Chamber average | 6.1 | 6.1 | 7.3 | 7.3 | |
Difference | -0.1 | -2.1 | -4.3 | -4.3 | |
Comparison | == | ||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Bill passage rate (learn more). What percent of Rep. Shurtliff's sponsored bills pass and are officially "enrolled"? (I ignore whether the governor signed or vetoted the bill.) | |||||
Bills introduced | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
Bills passed | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Passage rate | 17% | 50% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Chamber average | 51% | 53% | 63% | 58% | |
Difference | -33.6 | -2.8 | -63.5 | -57.6 | |
Comparison | == | ||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Bills floor sponsored. A "floor sponsor" is like a secondary sponsor of a bill. After a bill passes the sponsor's chamber, its sponsor needs to find a "floor sponsor" in the other chamber to usher it through the other chamber. | |||||
Total floor sponsored | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Chamber average | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.1 | |
Difference | -3.1 | -3.2 | -3.4 | -3.1 | |
Comparison | |||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Missed votes (learn more). Usually missed votes occur because of competing obligations within the legislature, not because the legislator has left the capitol. | |||||
Missed votes | 37 | 57 | 93 | 87 | |
Total votes held | 602 | 616 | 752 | 698 | |
Absentee rate | 6.1% | 9.3% | 12% | 12% | |
Chamber average | 8.3% | 8.3% | 6.4% | 7.1% | |
Difference | -2.2 | +1.0 | +5.6 | +4.9 | |
Comparison | == | ||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
"Nay" votes (learn more). Most floor votes pass by overwhelming majorities, since unpopular bills get weeded out long before they reach the floor. As a result, "nay" votes are rare. | |||||
"Nay" votes | 54 | 47 | 59 | 38 | |
Total votes held | 602 | 616 | 752 | 698 | |
"Nay" rate | 9.0% | 7.6% | 7.8% | 5.4% | |
Chamber average | 7.2% | 6.0% | 6.5% | 7.0% | |
Difference | +1.8 | +1.6 | +1.3 | -1.6 | |
Comparison | |||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Winning side rate (learn more). What percentage of the time (excluding near-unanimous votes) is the legislator on the winning side of a floor vote? | |||||
Winning side rate | 46% | 49% | 52% | 68% | |
Chamber average | 67% | 69% | 68% | 67% | |
Difference | -21.0 | -19.8 | -16.8 | +1.0 | |
Comparison | == | ||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Ideology score (NOMINATE method) (learn more). Using W-NOMINATE algorithm developed by Congressional scholars, I calculate each legislator's relative ideology after each General Session. I describe the method here. Scores have no intrinsic meaning. They are only relative: A legislator with a higher score is to the right ideologically of a legislator with a lower scale. Scores may be compared only within a single chamber and a single year. In most years, a conservative Republican will have a score above 0; a score close to 100 is extreme. | |||||
Contact me for scores. They get misinterpreted often enough that I now provide them only to political scientists. | |||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Party support score (overall) (learn more). How consistently does Rep. Shurtliff support his/her party? That is, what percentage of the time does the legislator vote with the majority of the other members of his/her party? Scores are usually easily above 90%. | |||||
Score (overall) | 96% | 97% | 97% | 96% | |
Chamber average | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
Difference | +1.6 | +1.9 | +1.6 | +0.8 | |
Comparison | |||||
2007 | 2008 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Party support score (party-line only) (learn more). This is the same as the "raw" party support score, but we look only at party-line votes when calculating this. A "party-line" vote occurs when the majority of Democrats votes against the majority of Republicans. Although party-line votes are rare, looking at the legislator's party support score in this setting can be revealing. | |||||
Score (party-line only) | 81% | 80% | 87% | 74% | |
Chamber average | 79% | 82% | 85% | 83% | |
Difference | +1.3 | -1.7 | +2.4 | -9.4 | |
Comparison | == | == | == |
Only 8 bills sponsored by Rep. Shurtliff have come to a vote. Listed below are all votes held on bills that Rep. Shurtliff sponsored. The votes are sorted by vote margin, with the most divisive votes listed first.
Year | Sponsor | Bill | Ayes | Nays | Margin (as % of total votes) |
Type of vote |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | Shurtliff | HB0068 | 39 | 32 | 9.9% | House/ passed 3rd reading |
2020 | Shurtliff | HB0241S02 | 23 | 46 | 33% | House/ failed |
2019 | Shurtliff | HB0189S01 | 18 | 50 | 47% | House/ failed |
2008 | Shurtliff | HB0330S01 | 19 | 6 | 52% | Senate/ pass 3rd |
2008 | Shurtliff | HB0330S01 | 61 | 11 | 69% | House/ concurs with Senate amendments |
2007 | Shurtliff | HB0012 | 56 | 9 | 72% | House/ passed 3rd reading |
2008 | Shurtliff | HB0330S01 | 24 | 3 | 78% | Senate/ pass 2nd & 3rd (Suspension) |
2008 | Shurtliff | HB0330S01 | 57 | 7 | 78% | House/ passed 3rd reading |
2008 | Shurtliff | HB0234 | 27 | 0 | 100% | Senate/ pass 3rd |
2008 | Shurtliff | HB0234 | 26 | 0 | 100% | Senate/ pass 2nd |