Menu Adam R Brown

Return to the Guide to the Utah Legislature.

Representative Travis M. Seegmiller
Utah legislator profile

Years served in the Utah legislature

First session in legislature: 2018
Most recent year of service for which data are available: 2022
Total sessions served in Utah House as of 2022: 6
Total sessions served in Utah Senate as of 2022: 0

How to read the statistical profile

I present a variety of statistics about Rep. Travis M. Seegmiller's service in the Utah legislature. I highlight differences from chamber averages using little green and red arrows. The number of arrows is statistically determined. More arrows indicate a larger difference compared to the chamber average, in relation to how much diversity there is among legislators on this metric. If all legislators introduce exactly 5 bills, then a legislator who introduces 10 is very different; if legislators vary wildly in how many bills they introduce (but the average is still 5), then a legislator who introduces 10 bills may be less different from average. The standard deviation measures this diversity.

Rep. Seegmiller's statistical profile

20182019202020212022
Service summary. Service prior to 2007 (if any) is not shown here. My database goes back only to 2007.
  Chamber HouseHouseHouseHouseHouse
  District H62H62H62H62H62
  Party RRRRR
Leadership NoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Years in chamber 13456
Years comparison LowerLowerLowerLower====
 
20182019202020212022
Bills sponsored (learn more) Bills written and promoted by the legislator in his/her own chamber.
Introduced by Seegmiller 06654
Chamber average 7.17.37.36.67.1
Difference -7.1-1.3-1.3-1.6-3.1
Comparison LowerLower==LowerLowerLower
 
20182019202020212022
Bill passage rate (learn more). What percent of Rep. Seegmiller's sponsored bills pass and are officially "enrolled"? (I ignore whether the governor signed or vetoted the bill.)
Bills introduced 06654
Bills passed 01010
Passage rate 0.0%17%0.0%20%0.0%
Chamber average 53%63%58%60%58%
Difference -53.4-46.5-57.6-39.8-58.2
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20182019202020212022
Bills floor sponsored. A "floor sponsor" is like a secondary sponsor of a bill. After a bill passes the sponsor's chamber, its sponsor needs to find a "floor sponsor" in the other chamber to usher it through the other chamber.
Total floor sponsored 01010
Chamber average 3.43.43.13.13.0
Difference -3.4-2.4-3.1-2.1-3.0
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20182019202020212022
Missed votes (learn more). Usually missed votes occur because of competing obligations within the legislature, not because the legislator has left the capitol.
Missed votes 541441275891
Total votes held 536752698666711
Absentee rate 10%19%18%8.7%13%
Chamber average 8.0%6.4%7.1%6.1%5.7%
Difference +2.0+13+11+2.6+7.3
Comparison ==HigherHigherHigherHigherHigher==HigherHigher
 
20182019202020212022
"Nay" votes (learn more). Most floor votes pass by overwhelming majorities, since unpopular bills get weeded out long before they reach the floor. As a result, "nay" votes are rare.
"Nay" votes 709398119101
Total votes held 536752698666711
"Nay" rate 13%12%14%18%14%
Chamber average 6.5%6.5%7.0%7.7%6.5%
Difference +6.5+5.5+7.0+10+7.5
Comparison HigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigher
 
20182019202020212022
Winning side rate (learn more). What percentage of the time (excluding near-unanimous votes) is the legislator on the winning side of a floor vote?
Winning side rate 39%49%45%59%51%
Chamber average 66%68%67%66%67%
Difference -27.6-19.4-22.4-6.6-16.5
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20182019202020212022
Ideology score (NOMINATE method) (learn more). Using W-NOMINATE algorithm developed by Congressional scholars, I calculate each legislator's relative ideology after each General Session. I describe the method here. Scores have no intrinsic meaning. They are only relative: A legislator with a higher score is to the right ideologically of a legislator with a lower scale. Scores may be compared only within a single chamber and a single year. In most years, a conservative Republican will have a score above 0; a score close to 100 is extreme.
Contact me for scores. They get misinterpreted often enough that I now provide them only to political scientists.
 
20182019202020212022
Party support score (overall) (learn more). How consistently does Rep. Seegmiller support his/her party? That is, what percentage of the time does the legislator vote with the majority of the other members of his/her party? Scores are usually easily above 90%.
Score (overall) 86%87%87%84%88%
Chamber average 94%95%95%94%95%
Difference -7.7-8.1-8.1-10.0-7.4
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20182019202020212022
Party support score (party-line only) (learn more). This is the same as the "raw" party support score, but we look only at party-line votes when calculating this. A "party-line" vote occurs when the majority of Democrats votes against the majority of Republicans. Although party-line votes are rare, looking at the legislator's party support score in this setting can be revealing.
Score (party-line only) 77%84%88%91%88%
Chamber average 83%85%83%85%84%
Difference -6.1-1.0+4.2+6.7+3.5
Comparison Lower==HigherHigher==

Votes on Rep. Seegmiller's bills

Only 2 bills sponsored by Rep. Seegmiller have come to a vote. Listed below are all votes held on bills that Rep. Seegmiller sponsored. The votes are sorted by vote margin, with the most divisive votes listed first.

Year Sponsor Bill Ayes Nays Margin
(as % of total votes)
Type of vote
2021 Seegmiller HB0038 20 4 67% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2019 Seegmiller HB0042 69 1 97% House/ passed 3rd reading
2021 Seegmiller HB0038 70 0 100% House/ passed 3rd reading
2019 Seegmiller HB0042 25 0 100% Senate/ passed 3rd reading