Menu Adam R Brown

Return to the Guide to the Utah Legislature.

Representative Michael J. Petersen
Utah legislator profile

Years served in the Utah legislature

First session in legislature: 2021
Most recent year of service for which data are available: 2025
Total sessions served in Utah House as of 2025: 5
Total sessions served in Utah Senate as of 2025: 0

How to read the statistical profile

I present a variety of statistics about Rep. Michael J. Petersen's service in the Utah legislature. I highlight differences from chamber averages using little green and red arrows. The number of arrows is statistically determined. More arrows indicate a larger difference compared to the chamber average, in relation to how much diversity there is among legislators on this metric. If all legislators introduce exactly 5 bills, then a legislator who introduces 10 is very different; if legislators vary wildly in how many bills they introduce (but the average is still 5), then a legislator who introduces 10 bills may be less different from average. The standard deviation measures this diversity.

Rep. Petersen's statistical profile

20212022202320242025
Service summary. Service prior to 2007 (if any) is not shown here. My database goes back only to 2007.
  Chamber HouseHouseHouseHouseHouse
  District H3H3H2H2H2
  Party RRRRR
Leadership NoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Years in chamber 12345
Years comparison LowerLowerLowerLower==
 
20212022202320242025
Bills sponsored (learn more) Bills written and promoted by the legislator in his/her own chamber.
Introduced by Petersen 35534
Chamber average 6.67.18.18.58.0
Difference -3.6-2.1-3.1-5.5-4.0
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20212022202320242025
Bill passage rate (learn more). What percent of Rep. Petersen's sponsored bills pass and are officially "enrolled"? (I ignore whether the governor signed or vetoted the bill.)
Bills introduced 35534
Bills passed 13331
Passage rate 33%60%60%100%25%
Chamber average 60%58%56%56%59%
Difference -26.8+1.8+3.7+44-33.7
Comparison Lower====HigherHigherLowerLower
 
20212022202320242025
Bills floor sponsored. A "floor sponsor" is like a secondary sponsor of a bill. After a bill passes the sponsor's chamber, its sponsor needs to find a "floor sponsor" in the other chamber to usher it through the other chamber.
Total floor sponsored 10212
Chamber average 3.13.03.53.34.6
Difference -2.1-3.0-1.5-2.3-2.6
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20212022202320242025
Missed votes (learn more). Usually missed votes occur because of competing obligations within the legislature, not because the legislator has left the capitol.
Missed votes 512393825
Total votes held 666711803845850
Absentee rate 0.8%1.7%4.9%4.5%2.9%
Chamber average 6.1%5.7%6.4%6.8%7.1%
Difference -5.3-4.0-1.5-2.3-4.2
Comparison LowerLower==LowerLower
 
20212022202320242025
"Nay" votes (learn more). Most floor votes pass by overwhelming majorities, since unpopular bills get weeded out long before they reach the floor. As a result, "nay" votes are rare.
"Nay" votes 10882756469
Total votes held 666711803845850
"Nay" rate 16%12%9.3%7.6%8.1%
Chamber average 7.7%6.5%7.1%5.7%6.2%
Difference +8.3+5.5+2.2+1.9+1.9
Comparison HigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigher
 
20212022202320242025
Winning side rate (learn more). What percentage of the time (excluding near-unanimous votes) is the legislator on the winning side of a floor vote?
Winning side rate 68%61%68%63%60%
Chamber average 66%67%69%68%69%
Difference +2.2-5.9-1.7-4.1-8.2
Comparison ==Lower====Lower
 
20212022202320242025
Ideology score (NOMINATE method) (learn more). Using W-NOMINATE algorithm developed by Congressional scholars, I calculate each legislator's relative ideology after each General Session. I describe the method here. Scores have no intrinsic meaning. They are only relative: A legislator with a higher score is to the right ideologically of a legislator with a lower scale. Scores may be compared only within a single chamber and a single year. In most years, a conservative Republican will have a score above 0; a score close to 100 is extreme.
Contact me for scores. They get misinterpreted often enough that I now provide them only to political scientists.
 
20212022202320242025
Party support score (overall) (learn more). How consistently does Rep. Petersen support his/her party? That is, what percentage of the time does the legislator vote with the majority of the other members of his/her party? Scores are usually easily above 90%.
Score (overall) 87%92%93%94%93%
Chamber average 94%95%96%96%96%
Difference -6.4-3.8-2.5-1.8-3.3
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20212022202320242025
Party support score (party-line only) (learn more). This is the same as the "raw" party support score, but we look only at party-line votes when calculating this. A "party-line" vote occurs when the majority of Democrats votes against the majority of Republicans. Although party-line votes are rare, looking at the legislator's party support score in this setting can be revealing.
Score (party-line only) 97%93%94%94%94%
Chamber average 85%84%88%87%88%
Difference +12+9.0+6.3+6.9+6.8
Comparison HigherHigherHigherHigherHigher

Votes on Rep. Petersen's bills

Only 14 bills sponsored by Rep. Petersen have come to a vote. Listed below are all votes held on bills that Rep. Petersen sponsored. The votes are sorted by vote margin, with the most divisive votes listed first.

Year Sponsor Bill Ayes Nays Margin
(as % of total votes)
Type of vote
2022 Petersen HB0085 34 41 9.3% House/ failed
2022 Petersen HB0085 32 42 14% House/ substitute adoption failed from # 0 to # 1
2024 Petersen HB0269S01 49 16 51% House/ passed 3rd reading
2023 Petersen HB0347 54 16 54% House/ passed 3rd reading
2023 Petersen HB0347 21 6 56% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2024 Petersen HB0460S03 21 5 62% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2024 Petersen HB0269S01 20 4 67% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2025 Petersen HCR015S01 61 12 67% House/ passed 3rd reading
2024 Petersen HB0460S03 60 7 79% House/ passed 3rd reading
2022 Petersen HB0357 27 2 86% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension