Menu Adam R Brown

Return to the Guide to the Utah Legislature.

Representative Carol Spackman Moss
Utah legislator profile

Years served in the Utah legislature

First session in legislature: 2001
Most recent year of service for which data are available: 2020
Total sessions served in Utah House as of 2020: 20
Total sessions served in Utah Senate as of 2020: 0

How to read the statistical profile

I present a variety of statistics about Rep. Carol Spackman Moss's service in the Utah legislature. I highlight differences from chamber averages using little green and red arrows. The number of arrows is statistically determined. More arrows indicate a larger difference compared to the chamber average, in relation to how much diversity there is among legislators on this metric. If all legislators introduce exactly 5 bills, then a legislator who introduces 10 is very different; if legislators vary wildly in how many bills they introduce (but the average is still 5), then a legislator who introduces 10 bills may be less different from average. The standard deviation measures this diversity.

Rep. Moss's statistical profile

20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Service summary. Service prior to 2007 (if any) is not shown here. My database goes back only to 2007.
  Chamber HouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouseHouse
  District H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37H37
  Party DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Leadership AsstWhipAsstWhipAsstWhipAsstWhipNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneWhipWhip
Years in chamber 7891011121314151617181920
Years comparison HigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigher
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Bills sponsored (learn more) Bills written and promoted by the legislator in his/her own chamber.
Introduced by Moss 65563346566586
Chamber average 6.16.15.96.16.36.45.86.46.77.06.77.17.37.3
Difference -0.1-1.1-0.9-0.1-3.3-3.4-1.8-0.4-1.7-1.0-0.7-2.1+0.7-1.3
Comparison ========LowerLowerLower==Lower====Lower==Lower
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Bill passage rate (learn more). What percent of Rep. Moss's sponsored bills pass and are officially "enrolled"? (I ignore whether the governor signed or vetoted the bill.)
Bills introduced 65563346566586
Bills passed 01130214144122
Passage rate 0.0%20.0%20.0%50.0%0.0%66.7%25.0%66.7%20.0%66.7%66.7%20.0%25.0%33.3%
Chamber average 50.6%52.8%59.9%60.9%55.0%54.3%65.8%52.2%63.0%53.5%61.4%53.4%63.5%57.6%
Difference -50.6-32.8-39.9-10.9-55.0+12.4-40.8+14.5-43.0+13.2+5.3-33.4-38.5-24.3
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerHigherLowerLowerHigherLowerLowerHigher==LowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Bills floor sponsored. A "floor sponsor" is like a secondary sponsor of a bill. After a bill passes the sponsor's chamber, its sponsor needs to find a "floor sponsor" in the other chamber to usher it through the other chamber.
Total floor sponsored 00101200320314
Chamber average 3.13.22.82.83.33.13.53.53.83.33.63.43.43.1
Difference -3.1-3.2-1.8-2.8-2.3-1.1-3.5-3.5-0.8-1.3-3.6-0.4-2.4+0.9
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower==LowerLower==Lower==
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Missed votes (learn more). Usually missed votes occur because of competing obligations within the legislature, not because the legislator has left the capitol.
Missed votes 406523412121517132018181330
Total votes held 602616600614651651658664699657727734752698
Absentee rate 6.6%10.6%3.8%6.7%3.2%3.2%0.8%2.6%1.9%3.0%2.5%2.5%1.7%4.3%
Chamber average 8.3%8.3%6.0%6.8%7.1%5.7%5.9%6.2%6.3%6.4%5.2%8.0%6.4%7.1%
Difference -1.7+2.3-2.2-0.1-3.9-2.5-5.1-3.6-4.4-3.4-2.7-5.5-4.7-2.8
Comparison ====Lower==LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
"Nay" votes (learn more). Most floor votes pass by overwhelming majorities, since unpopular bills get weeded out long before they reach the floor. As a result, "nay" votes are rare.
"Nay" votes 5847635196826257817992695651
Total votes held 602616600614651651658664699657727734752698
"Nay" rate 9.6%7.6%10.5%8.3%14.7%12.6%9.4%8.6%11.6%12.0%12.7%9.4%7.4%7.3%
Chamber average 7.2%6.0%8.1%7.4%8.4%7.8%7.3%7.5%8.6%7.3%7.1%6.5%6.5%7.0%
Difference +2.4+1.6+2.4+0.9+6.3+4.8+2.1+1.1+3.0+4.7+5.6+2.9+0.9+0.3
Comparison HigherHigherHigher==HigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigher==
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Influence or "floor power" (learn more). What percentage of the time is the legislator on the winning side of a floor vote?
Floor power score 44.6%47.2%52.4%60.5%41.3%53.1%54.0%59.7%58.3%57.3%52.9%56.6%47.3%64.7%
Chamber average 66.5%68.9%66.5%69.0%69.1%67.5%66.5%67.1%67.3%66.2%66.8%66.3%68.3%67.0%
Difference -21.9-21.7-14.1-8.5-27.8-14.4-12.5-7.4-9.0-8.9-13.9-9.7-21.0-2.3
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower==
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Ideology score 1 (from interest group ratings). Half a dozen interest groups release ratings of each legislator after each legislative session. I rescale them all from 0 (most liberal) to 100 (most conservative) and average them together, resulting in the numbers reported here.
Average rating 21.515.229.026.836.324.427.2nanananananana
Chamber average 56.946.655.260.868.557.356.8nanananananana
Difference -35.4-31.4-26.2-34.0-32.2-32.9-29.6nanananananana
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowernanananananana
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Ideology score 2 (NOMINATE method) (learn more). Using a widely accepted scaling method, I calculate each legislator's ideology score (called a "NOMINATE" score) after each legislative session. I describe the method here. Scores have no intrinsic meaning; they are useful only for comparing two legislators. A legislator with a higher score is more to the right ideologically of a legislator with a lower scale. In most years, a conservative Republican will have a score above 0; a score close to 100 is extreme.
NOMINATE score -72.1-72.5-66.3-89.5-83.9-96.0-87.8-79.2-77.2-73.6-82.2-82.9-80.3-85.0
Chamber average 3.7-2.53.9-4.90.99.17.99.519.025.220.79.816.117.4
Difference -75.8-70.0-70.2-84.6-84.8-105.1-95.7-88.7-96.2-98.8-102.9-92.7-96.4-102.4
Comparison LowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLowerLower
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Party support score (overall) (learn more). How consistently does Rep. Moss support his/her party? That is, what percentage of the time does the legislator vote with the majority of the other members of his/her party? Scores are usually easily above 90%.
Score (overall) 98.0%97.8%96.2%97.2%97.1%98.1%97.8%98.3%98.4%97.8%98.0%98.6%98.8%97.6%
Chamber average 94.5%95.4%94.3%94.7%93.7%94.3%94.7%94.1%93.8%94.6%94.9%93.8%95.4%94.8%
Difference +3.5+2.4+1.9+2.5+3.4+3.8+3.1+4.2+4.6+3.2+3.1+4.8+3.4+2.8
Comparison HigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigher
 
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Party support score (party-line only) (learn more). This is the same as the "raw" party support score, but we look only at party-line votes when calculating this. A "party-line" vote occurs when the majority of Democrats votes against the majority of Republicans. Although party-line votes are rare, looking at the legislator's party support score in this setting can be revealing.
Score (party-line only) 91.8%88.5%82.4%84.1%94.7%96.7%89.6%92.3%91.1%87.6%91.5%93.1%92.6%88.5%
Chamber average 79.3%81.7%81.4%84.3%85.1%82.7%81.2%80.1%81.9%85.4%87.1%83.0%84.6%83.5%
Difference +12.5+6.8+1.0-0.2+9.6+14.0+8.4+12.2+9.2+2.2+4.4+10.1+8.0+5.0
Comparison HigherHigher====HigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigherHigher==HigherHigherHigherHigher

Votes on Rep. Moss's bills

Many votes have been held on bills sponsored by Rep. Moss. In the interest of space, I display only the most and least divisive votes held on Rep. Moss's bills.

Rep. Moss's most divisive bills

Listed below are the 10 votes on bills sponsored by Rep. Moss that had the closest vote margin (as a percent of the total votes cast). When there are ties, I list the most recent bills first.

Year Sponsor Bill Ayes Nays Margin
(as % of total votes)
Type of vote
2010 Moss HB0091 14 14 0.0% Senate/ failed
2016 Moss HB0221S10 38 37 1.3% House/ passed 3rd reading
2016 Moss HB0221S10 39 35 5.4% House/ substituted from # 6 to # 8
2013 Moss HB0307 34 39 6.8% House/ failed
2009 Moss HB0101 40 34 8.1% House/ passed 3rd reading
2015 Moss HB0069S01 39 33 8.3% House/ passed 3rd reading
2020 Moss HB0101 40 32 11.1% House/ passed 3rd reading
2019 Moss HB0013 32 41 12.3% House/ failed
2019 Moss HB0385S03 31 40 12.7% House/ failed
2013 Moss HB0307 29 38 13.4% House/ failed

Rep. Moss's least divisive bills

Listed below are the 10 votes on bills sponsored by Rep. Moss that had the widest vote margin (as a percent of the total votes cast). When there are ties, I display the most recent bills first.

Year Sponsor Bill Ayes Nays Margin
(as % of total votes)
Type of vote
2020 Moss HB0362 24 0 100.0% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2020 Moss HB0362 68 0 100.0% House/ passed 3rd reading
2019 Moss HB0460 25 0 100.0% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2019 Moss HB0460 74 0 100.0% House/ passed 3rd reading
2018 Moss HB0189 24 0 100.0% Senate/ passed 3rd reading
2018 Moss HB0189 25 0 100.0% Senate/ passed 2nd reading
2018 Moss HB0189 72 0 100.0% House/ passed 3rd reading
2017 Moss HB0201 28 0 100.0% Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
2017 Moss HB0201 69 0 100.0% House/ passed 3rd reading
2017 Moss HB0133 26 0 100.0% Senate/ passed 3rd reading